bahram sarmast; hamed roshan cheshm
Volume 2, Issue 7 , December 2019, , Pages 77-98
Abstract
The modern arena created a special kind of cognition in science. Modern ontologies and epistemologies were based on the dual contrasts of scientific and non-scientific representations. ...
Read More
The modern arena created a special kind of cognition in science. Modern ontologies and epistemologies were based on the dual contrasts of scientific and non-scientific representations. In the passage of the natural and empirical sciences, in the form of a dominant discourse, the scientific concepts, the discipline of scientific methods, and the "cognition" of meaning-mining in the social sphere were "altered". Hence, in the twofold contrast, studies were formed in a disciplined and specialized way, and cognition became so dominated. On this basis, it is important to deconstruct such discourse on science in order to gain credible knowledge as well as the transition to interdisciplinary studies. The purpose of the present study is to deconstruct the scientific discourse of positivism and present an approach to the possibility of forming interdisciplinary studies. The main question of research is how the postmodern approach contributes to the formation of interdisciplinary studies. The research hypothesis suggests that a postmodern approach to the breakdown of dominant scientific and professional discourse creates some kind of interdisciplinary study. The present study, using descriptive-analytic method and the use of library studies and authoritative texts, suggests that the postmodern approach to the breakdown of the dominant scientific discourse of positivism has resulted in a methodological integration and interdependence that interdisciplinary studies itself. it has.
